Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Gujarat riots’

nmodi1

We at the Mad Hatter Times are proud to announce to the world that PM-candidate Mr Narendra Modi has decided to don sheep’s clothing. After a Gujarat court upheld a clean chit given to him for his involvement in the Gujarat riots of 11 years ago, Mr Modi decided to strengthen his candidature for the general elections in May – by revealing a new-found love for his Muslim brethren.

In a blog post, that an editor has described as a “brilliant example of creative wrting by a highly imaginative mind,” Mr Modi says “As if all the suffering was not enough, I was also accused of the death and misery of my own loved ones, my Gujarati brothers and sisters. Can you imagine the inner turmoil and shock of being blamed for the very events that have shattered you!”

 Modi 2002What brother, should we run relief camps? (referring to relief camps for riot affected Muslims). Should I start children producing centers there, i.e relief camps? We are 5 and our 25 !!! (Ame panch, Amara panch, referring the Muslim polygamy

Modi 2012:  I went everywhere and investigated. There used to be PILs [public interest litigation] in the Gujarat High Court very often those days. And some judgements say that the best facilities were provided to the refugees

Modi 2002:  Cant Gujarat implement family planning? Whose inhibitions are coming in our way? Which religious sect is coming in the way? Why money is not reaching to the poor? If some people go on producing children, the children will do cycle puncture repair only?

Modi 2013:  On one side was the pain of the victims of the earthquake, and on the other the pain of the victims of the riots. In decisively confronting this great turmoil, I had to single-mindedly focus all the strength given to me by the almighty, on the task of peace, justice and rehabilitation; burying the pain and agony I was personally wracked with.

Modi 2002:  Every child born in Gujarat should get education, enlightenment, livelihood and the economic order should be built up accordingly. For this purpose, there is a need for teaching a lesson to those people, who are expanding their population

Modi 2013:  I had appealed to the people of Gujarat on the day of the Godhra train burning itself; fervently urging for peace and restraint to ensure lives of innocents were not put at risk.

Modi 2002: We cannot permit merchants of murder freely operate in Gujarat.

Modi 2013: “In fact, my emphasis has always been on developing and emphasizing a spirit of unity; with the now widely used concept of ‘my 5 crore Gujarati brothers and sisters’ having crystallised right at the beginning of my tenure as CM itself from this very space”

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »


obama1Obama’s win has been hailed by many political commentators as the end of the “politics of grievance.” Their argument goes like “now that a black man has come to power, blacks can no longer blame the administration for not listening to their grievances.”

Just because a black is in power, doesn’t mean Afro-Americans are going to get a fair deal.

When A P J Abdul Kalam became the President of India, everyone welcomed a person from the scientific community entering the bureaucracy. Till date, he has been the most popular Indian President in power. But just because he was a Muslim, didn’t mean he in anyway represented the interests of the Indian Muslim.

Everyone knows about the atrocities committed against Muslims during the Gujarat riots. Everyone knows that it was state-sponsored genocide. World-wide human rights organisations, the UN and foreign countries condemned the violence against minorities, but what did Abdul Kalam do? He wasn’t going to antagonize the BJP Government, so he didn’t impose President’s rule in Gujarat or even kalam_veer_savarkarcondemn the violence. He toed the official BJP line and parroted the same things Advani & Vajpayee were saying. When Muslim groups approached him, he carefully avoided even sympathizing with his own community.

Kalam also unveiled the potrait of Hindu ‘mahasabha’ leader Veer Savarkar in the Central Hall of Parliament, after the entire Opposition boycotted the function. Veer Savarkar was the brains behind Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination and one of the accused in the case.

Hanging the portrait of the assassin (Veer Savarkar) in the same hall as the assassinated (Gandhi) is an insult to secularism. And Kalam ought to be ashamed of the part he played in it.

My point is just because Abdul Kalam was a Muslim, doesn’t mean he did anything for the welfare of Muslims. The same goes for Pratibha Patil; just because she’s the first woman Indian President, doesn’t mean the 5.6 billion women in India have been emancipated.

The same logic applies to Obama, his win doesn’t mean words like – race transcendence, race neutral, post-racial — hold true.

I don’t buy the argument that Obama’s election proves Americans are living in a post-racial America. Racism still exists. And its not just blacks, America discriminates against other races too; it calls them browns (Indians), Chinkies, Hispanics, Latinos, Jews, Poles, etc.

There are also other questions that rise: Will Obama take a pro-active stance for black rights or leave it to NAACP?

Will Obama be held less or more accountable for issues that affect the black community?

Will Obama’s every appointment of a non-white person be debated at length? Will Obama’s every welfare or non-welfare move be criticized in the light of his skin colour?

Will his election, put advocacy for racial equality on the back burner in the mainstream media?

obama2What will happen when riots in black ghettos break out? How will his administration be criticized? (Though no white President was criticized for the Ku Klux Klan, you can be sure violence by or against blacks will be taken as reflection of Obama’s administration).

Apart from the legitimate questions, there are questions from another realm like: Is Obama black? Is Obama black enough? Is Obama American enough? How can Obama talks about black rights, when none of his ancestors were tortured, beaten up by slave owners, the Ku Klux Klan, white policemen or the state militia? What can Obama know of black poverty in America?

Read Full Post »

;}

hindutvasword-poster1Fanaticism is something, I abore! And religious fanaticism is something unpalatable.

Events like Godhra, Ayodhya, the Gujarat riots or the atrocities against Christians in Orissa are something I find hard to digest.

Violence against minorities has become a trump card for many right-wing politicians. Since, no politician can deliver things like good roads, quality education and health care, regular supply of electricity or drinking water, they use diversionary tactics. One of the most successful diversionary tactic is to blame it all on the minorities.

So you can hear politicians say things like: “Hum panch, hamara panch,” “Muslims breed too much,” “Christians get funding from the US, they are George Bush’s stooges,” “India is for Hindus; out with the minorities,” “If you become a Hindu you can stay in India or else leave for Pakistan,” “Christian women are immoral and ape the West,” and “Valentine’s Day is against India’s culture.”

An extension of this is the regional separatist movements, in which to hide their inefficiency, politicians come up with slogans like, “Cauvery water is only for Karnataka,” or “Cauvery is only for Tamil Nadu,” “Mumbai is only for Marathis,” “Punjab must be a separate state,” rik-poster-back-cover1“Be proud to be a Tamilan,” “Ban Tamil films, only Kannada films in Karnataka,” “Kashmir is part of India,” & “Only Biharis should get jobs in Bihar.”

Some Indian politicians take diversionary tactics to international levels, they say, “Kill every Pakistani,” or “Support the LTTE,” “Ban the LTTE,” “No more refugees from Bangladesh, let them go to Pakistan,” “Every Muslim is a terrorist, destroy the Taliban,” “Support Israel’s war against Muslim terrorism,” or “Support the Palestinian war against Christian, Jewish terrorism.”

I’m going to come up with my own slogans, “Ban the Left in Nandigram, Singur,” “Ban the right in Orissa, Gujarat,” “Stop the Indo-US nuke deal,” “Third World countries don’t need second-hand goods, outdated technology and scrap material from the West,” “Stop religious competitiveness,” & “Stop hate-mail on the net.”

Read Full Post »

An RSS cadre on Gandhi:“He was a very cruel person for the Hindus”

The RSS cadre on Gandhi: “We did not want this person to live….We did not want this person to die a natural death, even if 10 lives were to be lost in this purpose”

Guessed who, the RSS man was? None other than Nathuram Vinayak Godse, the assasin of Mahatma Gandhi.

K. S. Sudarshan, sarsanghachalak of RSS, on avatars: “Every civilisation goes through the natural cycle of rise and fall and we are currently in the grip of a decline. Just like in the Mahabharata, I have to play the role of Krishna in the kali yuga.”

The smart aleck: “Forget me, the atheist. I don’t think that comment would go down too well with the theists either.”

K. S. Sudarshan on the Pope Benedict XVI and George Bush nexus: “Pope Benedict XVI and George Bush are conspiring to turn India into a Christian nation. Mr Bush knows that at the touch of a mouse, who is to be converted.”

The smart aleck: We have a feeling the CIA’s tracking everyone – it has no business to be tracking – illegally, apart from the poor, misguided, evangelistic, Christian minority missionaries. As to Interpol’s tracking down of non-entities in India, one can’t be too sure.

K. S. Sudarshan on how the CIA will go about it: “American Intelligence is seeking to convert India to Christianity with the help of non-governmental organizations. The CIA wants to have one Christian church in every post office area. To attain this end, the American President Bush allocated 20 billion dollars. So NGOs started to build schools, hospitals and public infrastructure only to veer the rural people away from their Hindu moorings. Missionaries are also involved in this plan, because they mislead tribals when they say we invaded their land.”

The smart aleck: I doubt anyone can forcibly get converted to Christianity. But I have seen a few persons, who have become pastors, for pure monetary reasons; for some poverty drove them; for others it was greed. We must also accept that none of the independent (protestant) pastors protested against the Gujarat riots, the Iraq war or Israeli atrocities in Palestine, when they could protest and conduct rallies against the anti-conversion law in TN and the Graham Steines incident. Just like the US Army has the feeling that only American deaths count, some Christians here also have the mentality that only atrocities against Christians count. So the accusation of the hard-line RSS is to a small extent true, in that, independent pastors are very faithful to their US masters or funding agents.

K. S. Sudarshan’s counter for Bush’s agenda: “I will spread Hindu spirituality in America.”

K. S. Sudarshan’s on the BJP poster-boys or BJP poster-grand dads: Atal and Advani should step aside. We don’t consider anyone Atalji’s successor.                                                       

Read Full Post »